Discussion:
[Plone-docs] state of plone.org/kb and sprint
sven
2013-08-27 14:47:02 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

I saw it today again on irc, new people are often confused about how we
handle documentation, with the result that ppl. not able to find
something or give up looking further because the link for example is
pointing to developer.plone.org and then they assume it is for
developers not for admins [happened today].
The other point is we do have some documentation under plone.org/kb and
some under developer.plone.org, for example if I take documentation
about apache, this could be/is confusing ....
How we want to solve this ?
- do we still want to use /kb or we want to integrate kb content to
developer.plone.org
- if we want to use kb and developer.p.o what goes where ?
- do we want to have developer.plone.org and for example
documentation.plone.org ?

Any ideas on this ? Anyone ? :)

Oh and what do you think about a 'github issues squashing party' aka a
documentation sprint ?

cheers

Sven
Dylan Jay
2013-08-27 22:29:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by sven
Hi,
I saw it today again on irc, new people are often confused about how we
handle documentation, with the result that ppl. not able to find
something or give up looking further because the link for example is
pointing to developer.plone.org and then they assume it is for
developers not for admins [happened today].
The other point is we do have some documentation under plone.org/kb and
some under developer.plone.org, for example if I take documentation
about apache, this could be/is confusing ....
How we want to solve this ?
- do we still want to use /kb or we want to integrate kb content to
developer.plone.org
- if we want to use kb and developer.p.o what goes where ?
- do we want to have developer.plone.org and for example
documentation.plone.org ?
I agree the developer manual is now increasingly misnamed. I think
because its successful it now includes everything but the end user
manual.
I think a sprint to review the kb to remove info already covered in the manual.
I think we should move the manual under the same domain. Eg
plone.org/docs/manual/4.3
Perhaps call it the integrator manual or just include the user manual
in one bundle and call it the plone manual.
Post by sven
Any ideas on this ? Anyone ? :)
Oh and what do you think about a 'github issues squashing party' aka a
documentation sprint ?
cheers
Sven
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
Israel Saeta Pérez
2013-09-03 08:55:46 UTC
Permalink
Helloes! Back to work! :)

I'm for dropping the documentation grouping by "user role", i.e.
Integrator, Developer, Admins, etc. I think it is better to group them by
topic, or organically as in http://developer.plone.org/#table-of-contents.

The only "role" I can think of that makes real sense is "end user", that is
the user who doesn't have to code or install anything but just use the
product, and that is already a book, isn't it?

Regarding the documentation sprint, I would be available starting from
October (remotely).

-- israel
Post by Dylan Jay
Post by sven
Hi,
I saw it today again on irc, new people are often confused about how we
handle documentation, with the result that ppl. not able to find
something or give up looking further because the link for example is
pointing to developer.plone.org and then they assume it is for
developers not for admins [happened today].
The other point is we do have some documentation under plone.org/kb and
some under developer.plone.org, for example if I take documentation
about apache, this could be/is confusing ....
How we want to solve this ?
- do we still want to use /kb or we want to integrate kb content to
developer.plone.org
- if we want to use kb and developer.p.o what goes where ?
- do we want to have developer.plone.org and for example
documentation.plone.org ?
I agree the developer manual is now increasingly misnamed. I think
because its successful it now includes everything but the end user
manual.
I think a sprint to review the kb to remove info already covered in the manual.
I think we should move the manual under the same domain. Eg
plone.org/docs/manual/4.3
Perhaps call it the integrator manual or just include the user manual
in one bundle and call it the plone manual.
Post by sven
Any ideas on this ? Anyone ? :)
Oh and what do you think about a 'github issues squashing party' aka a
documentation sprint ?
cheers
Sven
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by sven
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
Post by sven
_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
sven
2013-09-03 11:04:46 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

+1

<...>
The questions are:
- do we move into sphinx and maintain it there? Possibly with the help
of the new robotframework driven screenshots.
- do we move everything in developer.plone.org and put it in
http://plone.org/documentation and have it searchable from inside plone.org
- do we get rid of http://plone.org/documentation/kb?

I think I'm yes to all three.
</...>

cheers

Sven
Dylan Jay
2013-09-03 10:58:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Israel Saeta Pérez
Helloes! Back to work! :)
I'm for dropping the documentation grouping by "user role", i.e. Integrator, Developer, Admins, etc. I think it is better to group them by topic, or organically as in http://developer.plone.org/#table-of-contents.
I think by topic like this - http://developer.plone.org/#programming-plone
makes sense.
but sorting by manuals, tutorials, old manuals doesn't make any sense IMO
Post by Israel Saeta Pérez
The only "role" I can think of that makes real sense is "end user", that is the user who doesn't have to code or install anything but just use the product, and that is already a book, isn't it?
yes. http://plone.org/documentation/manual/plone-4-user-manual
The questions are:
- do we move into sphinx and maintain it there? Possibly with the help of the new robotframework driven screenshots.
- do we move everything in developer.plone.org and put it in http://plone.org/documentation and have it searchable from inside plone.org
- do we get rid of http://plone.org/documentation/kb?

I think I'm yes to all three.
Post by Israel Saeta Pérez
Regarding the documentation sprint, I would be available starting from October (remotely).
-- israel
Post by sven
Hi,
I saw it today again on irc, new people are often confused about how we
handle documentation, with the result that ppl. not able to find
something or give up looking further because the link for example is
pointing to developer.plone.org and then they assume it is for
developers not for admins [happened today].
The other point is we do have some documentation under plone.org/kb and
some under developer.plone.org, for example if I take documentation
about apache, this could be/is confusing ....
How we want to solve this ?
- do we still want to use /kb or we want to integrate kb content to
developer.plone.org
- if we want to use kb and developer.p.o what goes where ?
- do we want to have developer.plone.org and for example
documentation.plone.org ?
I agree the developer manual is now increasingly misnamed. I think
because its successful it now includes everything but the end user
manual.
I think a sprint to review the kb to remove info already covered in the manual.
I think we should move the manual under the same domain. Eg
plone.org/docs/manual/4.3
Perhaps call it the integrator manual or just include the user manual
in one bundle and call it the plone manual.
Post by sven
Any ideas on this ? Anyone ? :)
Oh and what do you think about a 'github issues squashing party' aka a
documentation sprint ?
cheers
Sven
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
Loading...